MGTOW AND JESUS CHRIST

Topic by goodkid43

Goodkid43

Home Forums The Litter Box MGTOW AND JESUS CHRIST

This topic contains 176 replies, has 25 voices, and was last updated by FrankOne  FrankOne 1 week, 1 day ago.

Viewing 17 posts - 161 through 177 (of 177 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #663284
    +3
    Nagolbud
    nagolbud
    Spectator
    664

    F~~~ THIS DIVISIVE BULLS~~~! SOME BELIEVERS UNITE! OTHERS DIVIDE! This thread speaks for itself!

    Yes. That atheists use female nature to support their religion. That they will attack anyone that voices a different theory and opinion. That they will ignore facts to uphold their religion. That they will shamelessly attack and make up conspiracy theories to attack someones character all to evade a conversation. It’s quite obvious who the divisive ones are in this thread. And it’s not the bible believers. Sorry girls, but daddy has to put his foot down. Ya’ll are acting 100% female nature. Go cool down for 20 minutes and stop with your emotional baggage. Re-read this thread and see how bad it really is. See how deceptive most atheist are and how they use female nature to their advantage.

    0100111*beep*0101010101101101~[A Glitch in the Matrix]~110010[transmissionterminated]000101101

    #663290
    +4
    SoylentGeneration
    SoylentGeneration
    Participant
    2219

    Unloading “baggage”.

    "We will meet in the place where there is no darkness" 1984

    #663300
    +1
    FrankOne
    FrankOne
    Participant
    866

    Punishment for behavior in this life…… That’s the thing. There used to be punishment for ruining a man, IN THIS LIFE. It is slowly eroding. An appeal by a man such as SpiritRR is NOT ridiculous. You don’t need God to have justice. Which is why Keymaster always says we have a legal system not a justice system. A legal system will apply a bulls~~~ law that favors a woman lying in order to f~~~ over an innocent man. A justice system would not.

    The women that do this s~~~ are not JUSTIFIED, because that implies justice. If there were justice, they’d be in jail. And you wouldn’t go to jail for something you were justified to do.

    Your argument has nothing to do with God. It has to do with the fact that there is no longer justice in our legal system.

    Correct — you will never truly have a ‘justice’ system but only a ‘legal’ system. Even with just laws, sometimes innocent individuals will be convicted. We do not have ‘justice’ because the wealthy get off easier. As do the well-connected. And was the system ever ‘just’? After all, slavery was enshrined in US law until the Civil War. And Family Law is inherently unjust; is the default to split custody 50/50 between the parents? THAT is injustice.

    Also, responding to others: The binary thinking in some of these posts and threads is juvenile. Good and evil people, come in both religious AND atheist flavors.

    #663301
    +6
    Old Sage
    Old Sage
    Participant

    Gentlemen.
    There is feeling in your gut when demate with a Man.

    Theres a feeling in your gut when you argue with a woman.

    Witch do you have right now?

    Masculinity shaming? Another one from female nature…. yet you keep projecting me to be the women. Dude you’ve got some serious issues.

    hahahah. Ever have a Biker f~~~ you in the ass little girl?

    Masculinity Good.Feminisim Bad.

    #663303
    +2
    Joller984
    Joller984
    Participant
    6861

    Sorry girls, but daddy has to put his foot down. Ya’ll are acting 100% female nature. Go cool down for 20 minutes and stop with your emotional baggage. Re-read this thread and see how bad it really is. See how deceptive most atheist are and how they use female nature to their advantage.

    Bye then.

    Thanks for dropping by. I really mean that.

    The truth is like poetry and most people hate poetry.

    #663309
    +4
    Old Sage
    Old Sage
    Participant

    Pray you never meet me c~~~.

    Masculinity Good.Feminisim Bad.

    #663312
    +4
    MG-ɹǝʍo┴
    MG-ɹǝʍo┴
    Participant

    hahahah. Ever have a Biker f~~~ you in the ass little girl?

    Axle grease, or dry?

    #663325
    +3
    FrankOne
    FrankOne
    Participant
    866

    nagolbud writes: . Can you be MGTOW without Jesus Christ? Sure, but it leaves for an empty life with nothing but materialism and self worship. Is it worth a conversation…

    More binary thinking. Warren Buffett is a very wealthy agnostic; and, donating 99% of his wealth to philanthropy on his death, also a significant philanthropist. He lives in a home he purchased for $31,000 in the 1950’s, despite being worth US $60 billion. You can be materialistic whether an atheist, agnostic or Christian… Same for narcissism.

    #663341
    Nagolbud
    nagolbud
    Spectator
    664

    nagolbud writes: . Can you be MGTOW without Jesus Christ? Sure, but it leaves for an empty life with nothing but materialism and self worship. Is it worth a conversation…

    More binary thinking. Warren Buffett is a very wealthy agnostic; and, donating 99% of his wealth to philanthropy on his death, also a significant philanthropist. He lives in a home he purchased for $31,000 in the 1950’s, despite being worth US $60 billion. You can be materialistic whether an atheist, agnostic or Christian… Same for narcissism.

    Of course. But that doesn’t answer my question. What did Warren live for? This is a strawman argument. Just because Warren lived in a cheap house doesn’t mean he wasn’t materialistic or doesn’t mean he didn’t live an empty life. Many reports show him and his wife were extremely unhappy. They even almost got a divorce but decided to keep going. Even so, the exception doesn’t change the norm. What does an atheist have to live for if he doesnt have family, kids, Jesus Christ, ect. Warren Buffet had a wife. The atheists I am referencing are MGTOW, so they will not have a wife. Once again, making this a strawman fallacie.

    0100111*beep*0101010101101101~[A Glitch in the Matrix]~110010[transmissionterminated]000101101

    #663441
    +1
    Gargamel
    Gargamel
    Participant

    As St. Pope John Paul II said, BE NOT AFRAID of the higher levels of truth.

    I am too late for the party but I guess we still have 30 pages to go…

    The Catholic Church is afraid of so many truths…

    Like this one:

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=child+abuse+catholic

    I have “survived” one of these things in the 1970’s…

    I might consider myself religious but I believe in the real thing and not in the hypocrisy of “the middle man” aka “Church”.

    Being a Christian (or whatever faith) shows in what you do and how you act in every day life, and not in the number of times you go to church to show off your new Rolex watch.

    :::::: Feminism is the “terminator gene” of mankind ::::::
    #663473
    +1
    Gargamel
    Gargamel
    Participant

    MGTOW is the counterweight to hypocrisy…

    The “brand name” Jesus Christ has been used and abused by institutions so many times that I would not dare to put both into one context.

    MGTOW is the opposite of “church”.

    But we represent values that can be compared to those that Jesus had 2000 years ago.

    Jesus Christ himself was a breakaway, a separatist “hippie” running away and opting out of the decadence of the Roman society.

    These cruel things that the “churches” (and I mean all of them) did were surely not in his right mind:

    Jesus Christ, if he were alive today, would surely file a lawsuit against the church for misusing his name.

    This guy in the video speaks the truth and the internet forums and real life congresses are full of former children’s home “inmates” that report matching stories of horror. (Especially in Germany, there is a round table commission working on these things)

    I personally was not sexually abused but the c~~~s tried to break my spirit.

    It worked like chopping off one of Hydra’s heads. LOL.

    :::::: Feminism is the “terminator gene” of mankind ::::::
    #663486
    +1
    Anonymousyam
    anonymousyam
    Participant
    4245

    I believe that I have contributed enough to this site and have been a member long enough to assert and articulate the necessity of Jesus Christ as the rational and fulfilling basis for MGTOW.

    Jesus is completely irrelevant to mgtow as mgtow is individualistic and Jesus has nothing to do with my personal mission. Sure you might believe in Jesus been you cannot state that Jesus is needing as the rational and fulfilling basis for mgtow without damn good evidence that not only Jesus exists but he is needed in mgtow which is not religious in nature.

    Mgtow is about your personal mission not needing a God at all but there is no limitation on belief (as long as you are following your personal mission not your so called Gods). A mgtow can believe in whatever bulls~~~ he wants to but there is no thing in mgtow which permits you to throw your bulls~~~ belief as a requirement to be mgtow (i do not need to believe that the world is flat to be a mgtow and you are dishonest if you try to assert similar things).

    Based on philosophy and logic, MGTOW is only fruitful if it is based on Jesus Christ. If not, then it is no different than Feminism.

    The belief in your religious deity is irrelevant to mgtow producing fruit as mgtow can produce fruit in anyone’s life without the needing of your God. The fruit of mgtow to an Atheist would be self actualization and living life for his benefit thereby being his fruit negating the need for any form of God.

    You are just putting a bulls~~~ step in front of mgtow that does not need to be there and is not relevant to it.

    Because, if this is the only life there is then any action which benefits a person

    Negative actions exist that do not benefit those in the long run so the f~~~ing c~~~s that do destroy men’s lives usually get punished in old age but even if they did not it still would not prove your God as existent or their action as moral (their actions still caused unneeded harm).

    It is not rational or reasonable to believe that Jesus Chris is the only Son of God and at the same time to assert that He has no say in what is proper in the “secular” world.

    You can believe in whatever bulls~~~ you want however you cannot just go and force that belief as a requirement for mgtow. Mgtow is secular as it applies across the board and is different from religious belief.

    Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

    #663638
    +1
    Gargamel
    Gargamel
    Participant

    Theres a feeling in your gut when you argue with a woman.

    Cat hair allergy.

    LOL.

    :::::: Feminism is the “terminator gene” of mankind ::::::
    #663640
    +1
    Gargamel
    Gargamel
    Participant

    Please stop trolling…

    “Oh, look how cuuuuute”

    :::::: Feminism is the “terminator gene” of mankind ::::::
    #663856
    +1
    FrankOne
    FrankOne
    Participant
    866

    nagolbud writes: . Can you be MGTOW without Jesus Christ? Sure, but it leaves for an empty life with nothing but materialism and self worship. Is it worth a conversation…

    More binary thinking. Warren Buffett is a very wealthy agnostic; and, donating 99% of his wealth to philanthropy on his death, also a significant philanthropist. He lives in a home he purchased for $31,000 in the 1950’s, despite being worth US $60 billion. You can be materialistic whether an atheist, agnostic or Christian… Same for narcissism.

    Of course. But that doesn’t answer my question. What did Warren live for? This is a strawman argument. Just because Warren lived in a cheap house doesn’t mean he wasn’t materialistic or doesn’t mean he didn’t live an empty life. Many reports show him and his wife were extremely unhappy. They even almost got a divorce but decided to keep going. Even so, the exception doesn’t change the norm. What does an atheist have to live for if he doesnt have family, kids, Jesus Christ, ect. Warren Buffet had a wife. The atheists I am referencing are MGTOW, so they will not have a wife. Once again, making this a strawman fallacie.

    This is how Buffett responded when asked about his greatest success or failure:

    Basically, when you get to my age, you’ll really measure your success in life by how many of the people you want to have love you actually do love you.

    I know people who have a lot of money, and they get testimonial dinners and they get hospital wings named after them. But the truth is that nobody in the world loves them. If you get to my age in life and nobody thinks well of you, I don’t care how big your bank account is, your life is a disaster.

    That’s the ultimate test of how you have lived your life. The trouble with love is that you can’t buy it … The only way to get love is to be lovable … The more you give love away, the more you get.

    As for his personal life, that one is VERY complicated. He separated from his wife mid-way through the marriage, but was with her on her deathbed and talked to her frequently. She moved out, but fixed him up with Astrid, whom he later married upon his wife’s death. And there was the affair with the newspaper publisher.

    #663864
    +1
    Gargamel
    Gargamel
    Participant

    Welcome to the Litter Box…

    :::::: Feminism is the “terminator gene” of mankind ::::::
    #664602
    +1
    FrankOne
    FrankOne
    Participant
    866

    nagolbud: Georges Lemaître did not ‘invent’ the big bang theory. Einstein developed the theory of General Relativity long before Lemaître. There are no static cosmological solutions to the equations of general relativity; since Einstein believed the universe was static, he inserted the cosmological constant into GR, to allow for a static solution. Of course, Einstein later called the cosmological constant the ‘biggest blunder of my life’.

    Alexander Friedman posed an expanding universe solution to general relativity 5 years before Lemaître. Lemaître is not insignificant in his contributions; however, he certainly didn’t ‘invent’ the big bang theory.

    As for your claim about Georges Lemaître ‘inventing’ evolution: Charles Darwin published The Origin of Species in the year 1859. Georges Lemaitre was born in 1894. So, he was born 35 years AFTER the seminal work on evolution, this pretty much refutes his inventing evolution as you suggest he did.

    Evolution has little impact upon one’s world view; many religious people of various faiths believe in evolutionary theory.

    First of all, Einstein was on the Vatican pay roll. Evidenced by his several photographs with them and literally receiving money from them. Secondly, Nikola Tesla proved Einsteins theory to be false. Factually. Third, Einstein was proven to be a plagiarist.

    Evolution has been around a long time. My claim is that HE is the one that pushed it out into mainstream on behalf of the vatican. Darwins father also worked for the vatican. The shock marketing value of my wording stands… the factual premise of the shock marketing is valid. If there wasn’t an agenda behind evolution why would they teach it in public schools and colleges along side feminism and liberlism? Be honest with yourself.

    Evolution has been around since Greek times; obviously, there have been refinements. As for Darwin being in league with the Vatican, again, primary sources. The Bishops of Cologne in 1860 condemned biological evolution; the Vatican itself was silent on it for decades, implicit affirmation of the 1860 condemnation. Furthermore, Darwin was essentially an AGNOSTIC, NOT a Roman Catholic. He had some Unitarian background in his early life.

    Einstein on the Vatican payroll? Evidence? Einstein was no friend of the Vatican. While he was a CULTURAL Jew as opposed to a religious Jew, he despised the persecution of Jews exercised under the Vatican’s brand of Christianity. Notice I did not say ALL Christianity; not ALL Christians were/are anti-semitic.

    “I predict that the Vatican will support Hitler if he comes to power. The Church since Constantine has always favoured the authoritarian State, as long as the State allows the Church to baptize and instruct the masses” (March 1930). – Albert Einstein

    I prefer Primary Sources, such as the above, to ‘photographs’ with ‘them’.

    Nikola Tesla proved Relativity wrong? Really? HOW, SPECIFICALLY?

    Was Einstein a plagiarist? I’d say no — more a collaborator, like many scientists — Poincaré, Hilbert, Lorentz, etc all played a role in the development of relativity theory; Einstein himself credited them.

    There are also multiple formulations of relativity that ‘work’ and explain observations; relative netwtonian dynamics, for instance.

Viewing 17 posts - 161 through 177 (of 177 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

The MGTOW Forums are for registered red-pill Men only. There are no exceptions. All females may exit immediately. Have you read The MGTOW Forums Guidelines (Last Updated 2015.01.02)? Please check it occasionally. Before you submit a post, kindly remember you are an important representative of
MGTOW | Men Going Their Own Way.

Trigger Warning EMERGENCY EXIT